1. | zero | 2. | \(aA\) |
3. | \(bA\) | 4. | \(A\sqrt{a^2+b^2}\) |
1. | \(15~\text{Nm}^{2}/\text{C}\) | 2. | \(10~\text{Nm}^{2}/\text{C}\) |
3. | \(30~\text{Nm}^{2}/\text{C}\) | 4. | \(0\) |
(a) | the electric field is necessarily zero. |
(b) | the electric field is due to the dipole moment of the charge distribution only. |
(c) | the dominant electric field is \(\propto \dfrac 1 {r^3}\), for large \(r\), where \(r\) is the distance from the origin in this region. |
(d) | the work done to move a charged particle along a closed path, away from the region, will be zero. |
Which of the above statements are true?
1. (b) and (d)
2. (a) and (c)
3. (b) and (c)
4. (c) and (d)
1. | \(\dfrac{Q+q}{4 \pi r_{2}^{2}}\) | 2. | \(\dfrac{q}{4 \pi r_{1}^{2}}\) |
3. | \(\dfrac{-Q+q}{4 \pi r_{2}^{2}}\) | 4. | \(\dfrac{-q}{4 \pi r_{1}^{2}}\) |
A point charge causes an electric flux of \(-1.0\times 10^{3}~\text{Nm}^2/\text{C}\) to pass through a spherical Gaussian surface of \(10.0\) cm radius centered on the charge. If the radius of the Gaussian surface were doubled, how much flux would pass through the surface?
1. \(- 2.0×10^{3}~\text{Nm}^2/\text{C}\)
2. \(- 1.0 ×10^{3}~\text{Nm}^2/\text{C}\)
3. \(2.0 ×10^{3}~\text{Nm}^2/\text{C}\)
4. \( 0\)
1. | \(\dfrac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}\times10^{-6}\) | 2. | \(\dfrac{2Q}{3\varepsilon_0}\times10^{-3}\) |
3. | \(\dfrac{Q}{6\varepsilon_0}\times10^{-3}\) | 4. | \(\dfrac{Q}{6\varepsilon_0}\times10^{-6} \) |
Given below are two statements:
Assertion (A): | The number of field lines drawn from a charge is proportional to the magnitude of the charge. |
Reason (R): | The electric field at any point is proportional to the magnitude of the source charge. |
1. | Both (A) and (R) are True and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). |
2. | Both (A) and (R) are True but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). |
3. | (A) is True but (R) is False. |
4. | Both (A) and (R) are False. |